Edward Snowden issues warning about mass surveillance: “What they’re selling is us”

Former US National Security Agency (NSA) analyst Edward Snowden warned about the risks of mass surveillance and the indiscriminate use of personal data, pointing out that these technologies are not only related to public safety or the fight against terrorism, but also to power, economic espionage, diplomatic manipulation, and social influence.

Snowden argued that digital surveillance allows governments and large corporations to know, with an ever-increasing level of detail, the activities of individuals, regardless of who they are or how ordinary their daily lives may seem.

 

“This isn’t about public safety. This isn’t about terrorism. This is about power.”

According to the former analyst, the development of surveillance systems and the mass processing of information opens the door to mechanisms capable of classifying and conditioning citizens based on their digital activities, personal relationships, purchases, and associations.

Snowden specifically warned about the possibility that these technologies could be used to build “social credit” systems, whereby algorithms would determine what opportunities a person might have based on the information collected about them.

In that scenario, he explained, family photos, online activity, purchases, friendships, or associations could become elements used to determine whether a person can buy a train ticket, board a plane, obtain a passport, access a job, or even work for the government.

 

Everyday Data Can Reveal an Entire Life

One of the main risks, according to Snowden, is that most people are unaware of the enormous amount of information their electronic devices generate daily.

A visit to a coffee shop, a prolonged stay in a hospital, a phone call, or a conversation with a family member may seem like isolated and irrelevant events. However, when this data is linked together, it can reveal highly sensitive information.

For example, Snowden explained, records might show that a person was in a coffee shop, then went to a hospital, stayed there for several hours, and then called their mother until midnight. If the hospital is a cancer clinic, the combination of this data could reveal information about that person's health, even without accessing the content of their calls.

This information is known as metadata: records that reveal aspects such as times, locations, contacts, and activity patterns, although they don't necessarily directly reveal the content of the communications. The problem, Snowden warned, is that these records are constantly being generated, often without users being aware of it, and can be collected, shared, analyzed, or intercepted by companies and governments.

 

“What they’re selling is us.”

For Snowden, the debate isn’t limited to the economic value of the data. The real risk lies in the fact that personal information can become a tool for wielding power over people.

 

While companies build business models based on these records and governments develop surveillance and analysis systems, he argued, the final product is not just information.

 

“What they’re selling is us.”

The former analyst stated that data allows people’s lives to be turned into an asset that can be used to influence their present and future.

“They’re selling our future. They’re selling our past. They’re selling our history, our identity,” he said.

In his warning, Snowden argued that the fundamental problem is that citizens can progressively lose control over their own histories and the information that defines their identity.

 

A warning about the power of data

Snowden’s message raises an increasingly relevant discussion in the digital age: who controls personal data and what can they do with it?

The expansion of artificial intelligence, automated decision-making systems, and the massive collection of information have increased the capacity of governments and companies to identify behavioral patterns and make decisions based on them.

 

For Snowden, the risk arises when this capacity is no longer used solely to prevent crime and begins to determine what a person can and cannot do.Su advertencia resume el dilema en una frase contundente:

“Cuando exponer un crimen se trata como cometer un crimen, estás siendo gobernado por criminales.”

—Edward Snowden

Previous Post Next Post